
Last year the Golden Knights second line was Erik Haula, David Perron, and James Neal. They netted 70 goals and put up 165 points, excellent offensive production for a second line. However, they posted a -26 rating despite taking just 26.3% (including neutral zone draws) of their faceoffs in the defensive zone.
We did have to change the second line from what it was last year because as far as second lines go it wasn’t good enough defensively. It produced, but the goals against per 60 minutes was not good enough. We were actually dead last for second lines in the league. -George McPhee on VGK Insider Show
We can’t find the exact stat showing Haula, Perron, and Neal but if McPhee uses the phrase “dead last” he’s got to be confident in the numbers. We could find this stat, however.
Line | TOI | GA | GA/60 |
---|---|---|---|
71/81/19 | 722:34 | 24 | 1.99 |
56/57/18 | 554:37 | 28 | 3.03 |
21/89/13 | 261:10 | 11 | 2.53 |
41/92/28 | 152:12 | 5 | 1.97 |
Those numbers are calculated based on the total time when all three players were on the ice together at even strength. As you can see, the Haula, Perron, Neal line was horrendous defensively, especially when compared to the Golden Knights first and “fourth” lines.
You can either look the other way on that or you can try to address it, so we are trying to address it. -McPhee on VGK Insider Show